Paper detail

Noise-Type Radars: Probability of Detection vs. Correlation Coefficient and Integration Time

Noise radars have the same mathematical description as a type of quantum radar known as quantum two-mode squeezing radar. Although their physical implementations are very different, this mathematical similarity allows us to analyze them collectively. We may consider the two types of radars as forming a single class of radars, called noise-type radars. The target detection performance of noise-type radars depends on two parameters: the number of integrated samples and a correlation coefficient. In this paper, we show that when the number of integrated samples is large and the correlation coefficient is low, the detection performance becomes a function of a single parameter: the number of integrated samples multiplied by the square of the correlation coefficient. We then explore the detection performance of noise-type radars in terms of this emergent parameter; in particular, we determine the probability of detection as a function of this parameter.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.