Paper detail

Noise Temperature of Phased Array Radio Telescope: The Murchison Widefield Array and the Engineering Development Array

This paper presents a framework to compute the receiver noise temperature (Trcv) of two low-frequency radio telescopes, the Murchison Widefield Array (MWA) and the Engineering Development Array (EDA). The MWA was selected because it is the only operational low-frequency Square Kilometre Array (SKA) precursor at the Murchison Radio-astronomy Observatory, while the EDA was selected because it mimics the proposed SKA-Low station size and configuration. It will demonstrated that the use of an existing power wave based framework for noise characterization of multiport amplifiers is sufficiently general to evaluate Trcv of phased arrays. The calculation of Trcv was done using a combination of measured noise parameters of the low-noise amplifier (LNA) and simulated S-parameters of the arrays. The calculated values were compared to measured results obtained via astronomical observation and both results are found to be in agreement. Such verification is lacking in current literature. It was shown that the receiver noise temperatures of both arrays are lower when compared to a single isolated element. This is caused by the increase in mutual coupling within the array which is discussed in depth in this paper.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.