Paper detail

Noise sensitivity for the top eigenvector of a sparse random matrix

We investigate the noise sensitivity of the top eigenvector of a sparse random symmetric matrix. Let $v$ be the top eigenvector of an $N\times N$ sparse random symmetric matrix with an average of $d$ non-zero centered entries per row. We resample $k$ randomly chosen entries of the matrix and obtain another realization of the random matrix with top eigenvector $v^{[k]}$. Building on recent results on sparse random matrices and a noise sensitivity analysis previously developed for Wigner matrices, we prove that, if $d\geq N^{2/9}$, with high probability, when $k \ll N^{5/3}$, the vectors $v$ and $v^{[k]}$ are almost collinear and, on the contrary, when $k\gg N^{5/3}$, the vectors $v$ and $v^{[k]}$ are almost orthogonal. A similar result holds for the eigenvector associated to the second largest eigenvalue of the adjacency matrix of an Erdős-Rényi random graph with average degree $d \geq N^{2/9}$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.