Paper detail

Noise-Sampling Cross Entropy Loss: Improving Disparity Regression Via Cost Volume Aware Regularizer

Recent end-to-end deep neural networks for disparity regression have achieved the state-of-the-art performance. However, many well-acknowledged specific properties of disparity estimation are omitted in these deep learning algorithms. Especially, matching cost volume, one of the most important procedure, is treated as a normal intermediate feature for the following softargmin regression, lacking explicit constraints compared with those traditional algorithms. In this paper, inspired by previous canonical definition of cost volume, we propose the noise-sampling cross entropy loss function to regularize the cost volume produced by deep neural networks to be unimodal and coherent. Extensive experiments validate that the proposed noise-sampling cross entropy loss can not only help neural networks learn more informative cost volume, but also lead to better stereo matching performance compared with several representative algorithms.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.