Paper detail

Noise amplification at spin-glass bottlenecks of quantum annealing: a solvable model

To gain better insight into the complexity theory of quantum annealing, we propose and solve a class of spin systems which contain bottlenecks of the kind expected to dominate the runtime of quantum annealing as it tries to solve difficult optimization problems. We uncover a noise amplification effect at these bottlenecks, whereby tunneling rates caused by flux-qubit noise scale in proportion to the number of qubits $N$ in the limit that $N\to \infty$. By solving the incoherent annealing dynamics exactly, we find a wide range of regimes where the probability that a quantum annealer remains in the ground-state upon exiting the bottleneck is close to one-half. We corroborate our analysis with detailed simulations of the performance of the D-Wave 2X quantum annealer on our class of computational problems.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.