Paper detail

NOEMA reveals the true nature of luminous red JWST z>10 galaxy candidates

The first year of JWST has revealed a surprisingly large number of luminous galaxy candidates beyond $z>10$. While some galaxies have already been spectroscopically confirmed, there is mounting evidence that a subsample of the candidates with particularly red inferred UV colours are, in fact, lower redshift contaminants. These interlopers are often found to be `HST-dark' or `optically faint' galaxies at $z\sim2-6$, a population that is key to improving our understanding of dust-obscured star formation throughout cosmic time. This paper demonstrates the complementarity of ground-based mm-interferometry and JWST infrared imaging to unveil the true nature of red 1.5-2.0 $μ\rm{m}$ dropouts that have been selected as ultra-high-redshift galaxy candidates. We present NOEMA Polyfix follow-up observations of four JWST red 1.5-2.0 $μ\rm{m}$ dropouts selected by Yan et al., 2023 as ultra-high-redshift candidates in the PEARLS-IDF field. The new NOEMA observations constrain the rest-frame far-infrared continuum emission and efficiently discriminate between intermediate- and high-redshift solutions. We report $>10σ$ NOEMA continuum detections of all our target galaxies at observed frequencies of $ν= 236$ and $252\ \rm{GHz}$, with FIR slopes indicating a redshift of $z<5$. We modelled their optical-to-FIR spectral energy distribution (SED) with multiple SED codes, finding that they are not $z>10$ galaxies but dust-obscured, massive star-forming galaxies at $z\sim 2-4$ instead. The contribution to the cosmic star formation rate density (CSFRD) of such sources is not negligible at $z\simeq 3.5$ ($ϕ\gtrsim(1.9-4.4)\times10^{-3}\ \rm{cMpc}^{-3}$; or $>3-6\%$ of the total CSFRD), in line with previous studies of optically faint and sub-millimeter galaxies. This approach opens up a new window onto obscured star formation at intermediate redshifts [abridged].

preprint2024arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.