Paper detail

Nodal Precession in Closely Spaced Planet Pairs

Planet-planet perturbations can cause planets&#39; orbital elements to change on secular timescales. Previous work has evaluated the nodal precession rate for planets in the limit of low $α$ (semi-major axis ratio, 0$<$$α$$\leq$1). Our simulations show that systems at high $α$ (or low period ratio), similar to multiplanet systems found in the Kepler survey, have a nodal precession rate that is more strongly dependent on eccentricity and inclination. We present a complete expansion of the nodal precession rate to fourth order in the disturbing function and show that this analytical solution much better describes the simulated N-body behavior of high-$α$ planet pairs; at $α\approx$ 0.5, the fourth-order solution on average reduces the median analytical error by a factor of 7.5 from linear theory and 6.2 from a second-order expansion. We set limits on eccentricity and inclination where the theory is precisely validated by N-body integrations, which can be useful in future secular treatments of planetary systems.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.