Paper detail

NOAO Fundamental Plane Survey -- II. Age and Metallicity along the Red Sequence

We present spectroscopic linestrength data for 4097 red-sequence galaxies in 93 low-redshift galaxy clusters, and use these to investigate variations in average stellar populations as a function of galaxy mass. Our analysis includes an improved treatment of nebular emission contamination, which affects ~10% of the sample galaxies. Using the stellar population models of D. Thomas and collaborators, we simultaneously fit twelve observed linestrength-sigma relations in terms of common underlying trends of age, [Z/H] (total metallicity) and a/Fe (alpha-element enhancement). We find that the observed linestrength-sigma relations can be explained only if higher-mass red-sequence galaxies are, on average, older, more metal rich, and more alpha-enhanced than lower-mass galaxies. Quantitatively, the scaling relations are age=sigma^(0.59+/-0.13), Z/H=sigma^(0.53+/-0.08) and a/Fe=sigma^(0.31+/-0.06), where the errors reflect the range obtained using different subsets of indices. We conclude that although the stars in giant red galaxies in clusters formed early, most of the galaxies at the faint end joined the red sequence only at recent epochs. This "down-sizing" trend is in good qualitative agreement with observations of the red sequence at higher redshifts, but is not predicted by semi-analytic models of galaxy formation.

preprint2005arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.