Paper detail

No vortex in straight flows -- on the eigen-representations of velocity gradient

Velocity gradient is the basis of many vortex recognition methods, such as Q criterion, $Δ$ criterion, $λ_{2}$ criterion, $λ_{ci}$ criterion and $Ω$ criterion, etc.. Except the $λ_{ci}$ criterion, all these criterions recognize vortices by designing various invariants, based on the Helmholtz decomposition that decomposes velocity gradient into strain rate and spin. In recent years, the intuition of 'no vortex in straight flows' has promoted people to analyze the vortex state directly from the velocity gradient, in which vortex can be distinguished from the situation that the velocity gradient has couple complex eigenvalues. A specious viewpoint to adopt the simple shear as an independent flow mode was emphasized by many authors, among them, Kolar proposed the triple decomposition of motion by extracting a so-called effective pure shearing motion; Li et al. introduced the so-called quaternion decomposition of velocity gradient and proposed the concept of eigen rotation; Liu et al. further mined the characteristic information of velocity gradient and put forward an effective algorithm of Liutex, and then developed the vortex recognition method. However, there is another explanation for the increasingly clear representation of velocity gradient, that is the local streamline pattern based on critical-point theory. In this paper, the tensorial expressions of the right/left real Schur forms of velocity gradient are clarified from the characteristic problem of velocity gradient. The relations between the involved parameters are derived and numerically verified. Comparing with the geometrical features of local streamline pattern, we confirm that the parameters in the right eigen-representation based on the right real Schur form of velocity gradient have good meanings to reveal the local streamline pattern. Some illustrative examples from the DNS data are presented.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.