Paper detail

No unique quadratic ephemeris for VW Cep

From the eclipsing binary VW Cep, 1963 epochs of primary and secondary minima have been registered since 1926. Because VW Cep is a shallow contact binary the direction of the flow from one component to the other could possibly be reversed. We aim to fit the observed eclipses into a scenario in which reversals may occur. Orbital period changes can not be fitted into a unique quadratic ephemeris, because of discontinuities in the (O-C) vs E graph. We try to obtain better agreement through the allowance of RLOF reversal in this binary system. From 1926 until 1943 the orbital period increase fits into a model of mass transfer from the less massive component. From 1946 on the direction of the mass transfer changed so that the most massive component became the donor star, as shown by a systematic period decrease. A sudden period increase in 1999 introduces a currently underway episode of mass transfer from the less massive component. The ephemeris of VW Cep can be fitted into a model in which the direction of the mass transfer was reversed twice since 1926.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.