Paper detail

No Significant Correlation between Line-emission and Continuum Substructures in the Molecules with ALMA at Planet-forming Scales Program

Recently, the Molecules with ALMA at Planet-forming Scales (MAPS) ALMA Large Program reported a high number of line emission substructures coincident with dust rings and gaps in the continuum emission, suggesting a causal link between these axisymmetric line emission and dust continuum substructures. To test the robustness of the claimed correlation, we compare the observed spatial overlap fraction in substructures with that from the null hypothesis, in which the overlap is assumed to arise from the random placement of line emission substructures. Our results reveal that there is no statistically significant evidence for a universal correlation between line emission and continuum substructures, questioning the frequently-made link between continuum rings and pressure bumps. The analysis also clearly identifies outliers. The chemical rings and the dust gaps in MWC 480 appear to be strongly correlated (${>}4σ$), and the gaps in the CO isotopologues tend to moderately (${\sim}3σ$) correlate with dust rings.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.