Paper detail

No evidence of histology subtype-specific prognostic signatures among lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma patients at early stages

Background Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the predominant histological type of lung cancer, accounting for up to 85% of cases. Disease stage is commonly used to determine adjuvant treatment eligibility of NSCLC patients, however, it is an imprecise predictor of the prognosis of an individual patient. Currently, many researchers resort to microarray technology for identifying relevant genetic prognostic markers, with particular attention on trimming or extending a Cox regression model. Among NSCLC, adenocarcinoma (AC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) are two major histology subtypes. It has been demonstrated that there exist fundamental differences in the underlying mechanisms between them, which motivated us to postulate there might exist specific genes relevant to prognosis of each histology subtype. Results In this article, we propose a simple filterer feature selection algorithm with a Cox regression model as the base. Applying this method to a real-world microarray data, no evidence has been found to support the existence of histology-specific prognostic gene signature. Nevertheless, a 31-gene prognostic gene signature for the early-stage AC and SCC samples is obtained, which provides comparable performance when compared with other relevant signatures. Conclusions Our proposal is conceptually simple and straightforward to implement. Therefore, it is expected that other researchers, especially those with less statistical knowledge and experience, can adapt this method readily to test their own research hypotheses.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.