Paper detail

No evidence for axions from Chandra observation of magnetic white dwarf

Ultralight axions with axion-photon couplings $g_{aγγ} \sim {\rm few} \times 10^{-11}$ GeV$^{-1}$ may resolve a number of astrophysical anomalies, such as unexpected ~TeV transparency, anomalous stellar cooling, and X-ray excesses from nearby neutron stars. We show, however, that such axions are severely constrained by the non-observation of X-rays from the magnetic white dwarf (MWD) RE J0317-853 using ~40 ks of data acquired from a dedicated observation with the Chandra X-ray Observatory. Axions may be produced in the core of the MWD through electron bremsstrahlung and then convert to X-rays in the magnetosphere. The non-observation of X-rays constrains the axion-photon coupling to $g_{aγγ} \lesssim 5.5 \times 10^{-13} \sqrt{C_{aγγ}/C_{aee}}$ GeV$^{-1}$ at 95% confidence for axion masses $m_a \lesssim 5 \times 10^{-6}$ eV, with $C_{aee}$ and $C_{aγγ}$ the dimensionless coupling constants to electrons and photons. Considering that $C_{aee}$ is generated from the renormalization group, our results robustly disfavor $g_{aγγ} \gtrsim 4.4 \times 10^{-11}$ GeV$^{-1}$ even for models with no ultraviolet contribution to $C_{aee}$.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.