NNSC-Cobordism of Bartnik Data in High Dimensions

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Abstract

In this short note, we formulate three problems relating to nonnegative scalar curvature (NNSC) fill-ins. Loosely speaking, the first two problems focus on: When are (n−1)(n-1)-dimensional Bartnik data (Σin−1,γi,Hi)\big(Σ_i ^{n-1}, γ_i, H_i\big), i=1,2i=1,2, NNSC-cobordant? (i.e., there is an nn-dimensional compact Riemannian manifold (Ωn,g)\big(Ω^n, g\big) with scalar curvature R(g)≥0R(g)\geq 0 and the boundary ∂Ω=Σ1∪Σ2\partial Ω=Σ_{1} \cup Σ_{2} such that γiγ_i is the metric on Σin−1Σ_i ^{n-1} induced by gg, and HiH_i is the mean curvature of ΣiΣ_i in (Ωn,g)\big(Ω^n, g\big)). If (Sn−1,γstd,0)\big(\mathbb{S}^{n-1},γ_{\rm std},0\big) is positive scalar curvature (PSC) cobordant to (Σ1n−1,γ1,H1)\big(Σ_1 ^{n-1}, γ_1, H_1\big), where (Sn−1,γstd)\big(\mathbb{S}^{n-1}, γ_{\rm std}\big) denotes the standard round unit sphere then (Σ1n−1,γ1,H1)\big(Σ_1 ^{n-1}, γ_1, H_1\big) admits an NNSC fill-in. Just as Gromov's conjecture is connected with positive mass theorem, our problems are connected with Penrose inequality, at least in the case of n=3n=3. Our third problem is on Λ(Σn−1,γ)Λ\big(Σ^{n-1}, γ\big) defined below.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.