Paper detail

NNLO unquenched calculation of the b quark mass

By combining the first unquenched lattice computation of the B-meson binding energy with the recently calculated two-loop contribution to the lattice HQET mass, we determine the $\bar{MS}$ b-quark mass, $\bar{m}_{b}(\bar{m}_{b})$ at the NNLO. We find $\bar{m}_{b}(\bar{m}_{b}) = (4.26\pm 0.03 \pm 0.04 \pm 0.05) {\rm GeV}$. The inclusion of the two-loop effects is one of the steps necessary to extract $\bar{m}_{b}(\bar{m}_{b})$ with a precision better than ${\cal O}(Λ_{QCD})$, which is the uncertainty due to the presence of an IR renormalon singularity in the perturbative series of the residual mass. Our results have been obtained on a sample of 60 lattices of size $24^{3}\times 40$ at $β=5.6$, using the unquenched Wilson action with two degenerate sea quarks. The quark propagators have been computed using the unquenched links generated by the T$χ$L Collaboration.

preprint1999arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.