Paper detail

NLO radiative corrections for Forward-Backward and Left-Right Asymmetries at a B-Factory

This paper presents the first calculations of the parity-violating polarization asymmetry and forward-backward asymmetry of the $e^- e^+ \rightarrow μ^+ μ^- (γ)$ process at a center-of-mass energy of 10.58 GeV with up to one-loop electroweak radiative corrections. The calculations are relevant for future precision electroweak measurements at the Belle~II experiment, which is now collecting data at the SuperKEKB $e^- e^+$ collider with a center-of-mass energy at the mass of the $Υ(4S)$ resonance. In this paper we take under full control the bremsstrahlung process at the conditions of Belle II/SuperKEKB, and the possibilities for a soft photon approach are discussed. The scale of the obtained relative corrections to the parity-violating and forward-backward asymmetries is significant and the scattering angle dependencies of the asymmetries is non-trivial. As an additional validation cross-check using an independent formulation, the calculated asymmetries are compared to results from the KK Monte Carlo generator.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.