Paper detail

Nitrogen line spectroscopy in O-stars -- III. The earliest O-stars

This is the third paper in a series aiming at the analysis of nitrogen abundances in O-type stars, to enable further constraints on the early evolution of massive stars. We provide first theoretical predictions for the NIV4058/NIII4640 emission line ratio in dependence of various parameters, and confront them with results from the analysis of a sample of early LMC/SMC O-stars. Stellar and wind parameters are determined by line profile fitting of H/He/N lines, exploiting the helium and nitrogen ionization balance. Corresponding synthetic spectra are calculated using the NLTE atmospheric code FASTWIND. Though there is a monotonic relationship between the emission line ratio and Teff, all other parameters being equal, theoretical predictions indicate additional dependencies, most notably, on the nitrogen abundance. These basic predictions are confirmed by results from atmospheric code CMFGEN. The effective temperatures for the earliest O-stars, inferred from the nitrogen ionization balance, are partly considerably hotter than indicated by previous studies. Consistent with earlier results, effective temperatures increase from supergiants to dwarfs for all spectral types in the LMC. The relation between observed NIV4058/NIII4640 emission line ratio and Teff, for a given luminosity class, turned out to be quite monotonic for our sample stars, and fairly consistent with our model predictions. The scatter within a spectral sub-type is mainly produced by abundance effects. Our findings suggest that the Walborn et al. (2002) classification scheme is able to provide a meaningful relation between spectral type and Teff, provided that it is possible to discriminate for the luminosity class. This might be difficult to achieve in low-Z environments such as the SMC, owing to rather low wind-strengths. According to our predictions, the major bias of the classification scheme is due to nitrogen content.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.