Paper detail

NICMOS transmission spectroscopy of HD 189733b: controversy becomes confirmation

Spectral features corresponding to methane and water opacity were reported based on spectroscopic observations of HD 189733b with Hubble/NICMOS. Recently, these data, and other NICMOS exoplanet spectroscopy measurements, have been reexamined in Gibson et al. 2010, who claim that the features in the transmission spectra are due to uncorrected systematic errors and not molecular opacities. We examine the methods used by the Gibson team and show that, contrary to their claim, their results for the transmission spectrum of HD 189733b are in fact in agreement with the original results. In the case of HD 189733b, the most significant problem with the Gibson approach is a poorly determined instrument model, which causes (1) an increase in the formal uncertainty and (2) instability in the minimization process; although Gibson et al. do recover the correct spectrum, they cannot identify it due to the problems caused by a poorly determined instrument model. In the case of XO-1b, the Gibson method is fundamentally flawed because they omit the most important parameters from the instrument model. For HD 189733b, the Gibson team did not omit these parameters, which explains why they are able to reproduce previous results in this case, although with poor SNR.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.