Paper detail

NGC 1850 BH1 is another stripped-star binary masquerading as a black hole

We show that the radial velocity-variable star in the black hole candidate NGC 1850 BH1 cannot be a normal $\approx 5\,M_{\odot}$ subgiant, as was proposed, but is an overluminous stripped-envelope star with mass $\approx 1 M_{\odot}$. The result follows directly from the star's observed radius and the orbital period -- density relation for Roche lobe-filling stars: the star's density, as constrained by the observed ellipsoidal variability, is too low for its mass to exceed $\approx 1.5\,M_{\odot}$. This lower mass significantly reduces the implied mass of the unseen companion and qualitative interpretation of the system, such that a normal main-sequence companion with mass $(2.5-5)\,M_{\odot}$ is fully consistent with the data. We explore evolutionary scenarios that could produce the binary using MESA and find that its properties can be matched by models in which a $\sim5\,M_{\odot}$ primary loses most of its envelope to a companion and is observed in a bloated state before contracting to become a core helium burning sdOB star. This is similar to the scenario proposed to explain the binaries LB-1 and HR 6819. Though it likely does not contain a black hole, NGC 1850 BH1 provides an interesting test case for binary evolution models, particularly given its membership in a cluster of known age.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.