Paper detail

Newtonian limit of Einsteinian gravity: from dynamics of Solar system to dynamics of stars in spiral galaxies

Attempts to merge Einsteinian gravity with Newtonian run into inconsistencies because in Newton's gravity time is absolute and the speed of gravity is infinite. Such an assumption was in a focus of attention of scientists in 19th century interested in finding out if the speed of gravity is infinite. By analogy with electrodynamics, some retarded potentials replacing Newtonian were utilized. By using one of such potentials Gerber correctly calculated the perihelion shift for Mercury in 1902. Subsequent attempts at calculation of bending of light using Gerber-style calculations were not successful. Recently Giné (Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 42, 1893 (2009)) reobtained both the perihelion shift and the bending of light using retarded potential. His equations however are not those obtained by Einstein and his results coincide with those by Einstein only at the level of leading order terms of infinite series expansions. The obtained differential equations of motion are of delay-type. When applied to two-body dynamics, such equations lead to orbital quantization. In this work the Einsteinian approach is used to reproduce this quantization. Numerous arguments justifying the superiority of Einsteinian approach, including uses of the Bertrand spacetimes for description of motion of stars around galactic centers are provided. The developed formalism is tested by calculating the number of allowed stable orbits for planets and those for regular satellites of heavy planets resulting in reasonable agreement with observational data. The paper also discusses possible quantum mechanical nature of rings of heavy planets as well as of rotation curves of stars in spiral galaxies.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.