Paper detail

Newcomers and suburbanites can drive the evolution of the size-stellar mass relation of early type galaxies in galaxy clusters

At fixed stellar mass $M_*$, the effective radius $R_{\rm e}$ of massive satellite early-type galaxies (ETGs) in galaxy clusters is, on average, larger at lower redshift. We study theoretically this size evolution using the state-of-the-art cosmological simulation IllustrisTNG100: we sampled $75$ simulated satellite ETGs at redshift $z=0$ with $M_* \ge 10^{10.4} M_{\odot}$ belonging to the two most massive ($\approx 10^{14.6} M_{\odot} $) haloes of the simulation. We traced back in time the two clusters' main progenitors and we selected their satellite ETGs at $z>0$ with the same criterion adopted at $z=0$. The $R_{\rm e}-M_*$ relation of the simulated cluster satellite ETGs, which is robustly measured out to $z=0.85$, evolves similarly to the observed relation over the redshift range $0\lesssim z \lesssim 0.85$. In the simulation the main drivers of this evolution are the acquisition of new galaxies ("newcomers") by the clusters and the transformation of member galaxies located at large clustercentric distance ("suburbanites") at $z=0.85$, which end up being massive satellite ETGs at $z=0$. Though several physical processes contribute to change the population of satellite ETGs in the considered redshift interval, the shape of the stellar mass function of the simulated cluster ETGs is not significantly different at $z=0.85$ and at $z=0$, consistent with observations.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.