Paper detail

New Variable Stars in the Globular Cluster NGC 6584

Using the Southeastern Association for Research in Astronomy 0.6 meter telescope located at Cerro Tololo, we searched for variable stars in the southern globular cluster NGC 6584. We obtained images during 8 nights between 28 May and 6 July of 2011. After processing the images, we used the image subtraction package ISIS developed by Alard (2000)to search for the variable stars. We identified a total of 69 variable stars in our 10x10 arcmin^2 field, including 43 variables cataloged by Millis & Liller (1980) and 26 hereto unknown variables. In total, we classified 46 of the variables as type RRab, with a mean period of 0.56776 days, 15 as type RRc with a mean period of 0.30886 days, perhaps one lower amplitude type RRe, with a period of 0.26482 days, 4 eclipsing binaries, and 3 long period (P > 2 days) variable stars. As many as 15 of the RRab Lyrae stars exhibited the Blazhko Effect. Furthermore, the mean periods of the RR Lyrae types, the exhibited period/amplitude relationship, and the ratio of N_c/(N_ab+N_c) of 0.25 are consistent with an Oosterhoff Type I cluster. Here we present refined periods, V-band light curves, and classifications for each of the 69 variables, as well as a color-magnitude diagram of the cluster.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.