Paper detail

New thought on Matsumura-Nishida theory in the $L_p$-$L_q$ maximalregularity framework

In this paper, we prove the global wellposedness of the Navier-Stokes equations describing a motion of compressible, viscous, barotropic fluid flow in a 3 dim. exterior domain in the $L_p$ in time and $L_2 \cap L_6$ maximal regularity framework. This is an extension of a famous thoerem due to Matsumura-Nishida Commun Math. Phys. 89 (1983), 445--464. In Matsumura and Nishida theory, they used energy method and their requirement was that space derivatives of the mass density up to third order and space derivatives of the velocity fields up to fourth order belong to $L_2$ in space-time. On the other hand, in the present manuscript space derivatives of the mass density up to first order and the space derivatives of the velocity fields up to second order belong to $L_2$ in maximal and $L_2 \cap L_6$ in space. The proof is based on the $L_p$-$L_q$ maximal regularity and decay properties of solutions to the linearized equations, namely Stokes equations appering in the study of compressible fluid flows.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.