Paper detail

New Strong Line Abundance Diagnostics for \HII Regions: Effects of $κ$-Distributed Electron Energies and New Atomic Data

Recently, \citet{Nicholls12}, inspired by \emph{in situ} observations of solar system astrophysical plasmas, suggested that the electrons in \HII regions are characterised by a $κ$-distribution of electron energies rather than by a simple Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution. Here we have collected together the new atomic data within a modified photoionisation code to explore the effects of both the new atomic data and the $κ$-distribution on the strong-line techniques used to determine chemical abundances in \HII regions. By comparing the recombination temperatures ($T_{\rm rec}$) with the forbidden line temperatures ($T_{\rm FL}$) we conclude that $ κ\sim 20$. While representing only a mild deviation from equilibrium, this is sufficient to strongly influence abundances determined using methods which depend on measurements of the electron temperature from forbidden lines. We present a number of new emission line ratio diagnostics which cleanly separate the two parameters determining the optical spectrum of \HII regions - the ionisation parameter $q$ or $\cal{U}$ and the chemical abundance; 12+log(O/H). An automated code to extract these parameters is presented. Using the homogeneous dataset from \citet{vanZee98}, we find self-consistent results between all these different diagnostics. The systematic errors between different line ratio diagnostics are much smaller than was found in the earlier strong line work. Overall the effect of the $κ$-distribution on the strong line abundances derived solely on the basis of theoretical models is rather small.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.