Paper detail

New self-consistent wind parameters fitting optical spectra of O-type stars observed with HERMES spectrograph

We perform spectral fitting for a set of O-type stars based on self-consistent wind solutions, which provide mass-loss rate and velocity profiles directly derived from the initial stellar parameters. The great advantage of this self-consistent spectral fitting is therefore the reduction of the number of free parameters to be tuned. Self-consistent values for the line-force parameters (k,alpha,delta) and subsequently for the mass-loss rate and terminal velocity are provided by the m-CAK prescription introduced in Paper I, updated in this work with improvements such as a temperature structure for the wind, self-consistently evaluated from the line-acceleration. Synthetic spectra are calculated using the radiative transfer code FASTWIND, replacing the classical beta-law for our new calculated velocity profiles. We found that self-consistent m-CAK solutions provide values for theoretical mass-loss rates on the order of the most recent predictions of other studies. From here, we generate synthetic spectra with self-consistent hydrodynamics to fit and obtain a new set of stellar and wind parameters for our sample of O-type stars whose spectra was taken with the high resolution echelle spectrograph HERMES (R=85000). We find a satisfactory global fit for our observations, with good accuracy for photospheric He I and He II lines and a quite acceptable fit for H lines. Although this self-consistent spectral analysis is currently constrained in the optical wavelength range only, this is an important step towards the determination of stellar and wind parameters without using a beta-law. Given these results, we expect that the values introduced here should be helpful for future studies about the stars constituting this sample, together with the prospective that the m-CAK self-consistent prescription be extended to numerous studies about massive stars in future.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.