Paper detail

New results on the search for $B^0_s\rightarrow μ^+μ^-$ from LHCb

A search for the rare decays $B^0_s\rightarrow μ^+μ^-$ and $B^0\rightarrow μ^+μ^-$ is performed with the LHCb experiment using 1.1\,fb$^{-1}$ of data collected at $\sqrt s=8$\,TeV$ and 1.0\,fb$^{-1}$ of data collected at $\sqrt s=7$\,TeV. An excess of $B^0_s\rightarrow μ^+μ^-$ candidates with respect to the background expectations is observed with a statistical significance of 3.5 standard deviations. A branching fraction of ${\cal BR}(B^0_s\rightarrow μ^+μ^-) =(3.2^{+1.5}_{-1.2}) \times 10^{-9}$ is measured with an unbinned maximum likelihood fit. The measured branching fraction is in agreement with the expectation from the Standard Model. The observed number of $B^0\rightarrow μ^+μ^-$ candidates is consistent with the background expectation and an upper limit on the branching fraction of ${\cal BR}(B^0\rightarrow μ^+μ^-) < 9.4\times10^{-10}$ is obtained.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.