Paper detail

New results on simplex-clusters in set systems

A $d$-simplex is defined to be a collection $A_1,\dots,A_{d+1}$ of subsets of size $k$ of $[n]$ such that the intersection of all of them is empty, but the intersection of any $d$ of them is non-empty. Furthermore, a $d$-cluster is a collection of $d+1$ such sets with empty intersection and union of size $\le 2k$, and a $d$-simplex-cluster is such a collection that is both a $d$-simplex and a $d$-cluster. The Erdős-Chvátal $d$-simplex Conjecture from 1974 states that any family of $k$-subsets of $[n]$ containing no $d$-simplex must be of size no greater than $ {n -1 \choose k-1}$. In 2011, Keevash and Mubayi extended this conjecture by hypothesizing that the same bound would hold for families containing no $d$-simplex-cluster. In this paper, we resolve Keevash and Mubayi&#39;s conjecture for all $4 \le d+1 \le k$ and $n \ge 2k-d+2$, which in turn resolves all remaining cases of the Erdős-Chvátal Conjecture except when $n$ is very small (i.e. $n < 2k-d+2$).

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.