Paper detail

New results for the Mondrian art problem

The Mondrian problem consists of dissecting a square of side length $n\in \NN$ into non-congruent rectangles with natural length sides such that the difference $d(n)$ between the largest and the smallest areas of the rectangles partitioning the square is minimum. In this paper, we compute some bounds on $d(n)$ in terms of the number of rectangles of the square partition. These bounds provide us optimal partitions for some values of $n \in \NN$. We provide a sequence of square partitions such that $d(n)/n^2$ tends to zero for $n$ large enough. For the case of `perfect' partitions, that is, with $d(n)=0$, we show that, for any fixed powers $s_1,\ldots, s_m$, a square with side length $n=p_1^{s_1}\cdots p_m^{s_m}$, can have a perfect Mondrian partition only if $p_1$ satisfies a given lower bound. Moreover, if $n(x)$ is the number of side lengths $x$ (with $n\le x$) of squares not having a perfect partition, we prove that its `density' $\frac{n(x)}{x}$ is asymptotic to $\frac{(\log(\log(x))^2}{2\log x}$, which improves previous results.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.