Paper detail

New Progress in Classic Area: Polynomial Root-squaring and Root-finding

The DLG root-squaring iterations, due to Dandelin 1826 and rediscovered by Lobachevsky 1834 and Graeffe 1837, have been the main approach to root-finding for a univariate polynomial p(x) in the 19th century and beyond, but not so nowadays because these iterations are prone to severe numerical stability problems. Trying to avoid these problems we have found simple but novel reduction of the iterations applied for Newton's inverse ratio -p'(x)/p(x) to approximation of the power sums of the zeros of p(x) and its reverse polynomial. The resulting polynomial root-finders can be devised and performed independently of DLG iterations, based on Newton's identities or Cauchy integrals. In the former case the computation involve a set of leading or tailing coefficients of an input polynomial. In the latter case we must scale the variable and increase the arithmetic computational cost to ensure numerical stability. Nevertheless the cost is still manageable, at least for fast root-refinement, and the algorithms can be applied to a black box polynomial p(x)--given by a black box for the evaluation of the ratio p'(x)/p(x) rather than by its coefficients. This enables important computational benefits, including efficient recursive as well as concurrent approximation of a set of zeros of p(x) or even all of its zeros, acceleration where an input polynomial can be evaluated fast, and extension to approximation of the eigenvalues of a matrix or a polynomial matrix, being efficient if the matrix can be inverted fast, e.g., is data sparse. We also recall our recent fast algorithms for approximation of the root radii, that is, the distances to the roots from the origin or any complex value to the zeros of p(x), and apply it for fast black box initialization of polynomial root-finding by means of functional iterations, e.g., Newton's, Ehrlich's, and Weierstrass's.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.