Paper detail

New Physics Contributions to the Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment: A Numerical Code

We consider the contributions of individual new particles to the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon, utilizing the generic framework of simplified models. We also present analytic results for all possible one-loop contributions, allowing easy application of these results for more complete models which predict more than one particle capable of correcting the muon magnetic moment. Additionally, we provide a Mathematica code to allow the reader straightforwardly compute any 1-loop contribution. Furthermore, we derive bounds on each new particle considered, assuming either the absence of other significant contributions to $a_μ$ or that the anomaly has been resolved by some other mechanism. The simplified models we consider are constructed without the requirement of $SU(2)_L$ invariance, but appropriate chiral coupling choices are also considered. In summary, we found the following particles capable of explaining the current discrepancy, assuming unit couplings: $2$~TeV ($0.3$~TeV) neutral scalar with pure scalar (chiral) couplings, $4$~TeV doubly charged scalar with pure pseudoscalar coupling, $0.3-1$~TeV neutral vector boson depending on what couplings are used (vector, axial, or mixed), $0.5-1$~TeV singly-charged vector boson depending on which couplings are chosen, and $3$~TeV doubly-charged vector-coupled bosons. We also derive the following $1σ$ lower bounds on new particle masses assuming unit couplings and that the experimental anomaly has been otherwise resolved: a doubly charged pseudo-scalar must be heavier than $7$~TeV, a neutral scalar than $3$~TeV, a vector-coupled new neutral boson $600$~GeV, an axial-coupled neutral boson $1.5$~TeV, a singly-charged vector-coupled $W^\prime$ $1$~TeV, a doubly-charged vector-coupled boson $5$~TeV, scalar leptoquarks $10$~TeV, and vector leptoquarks $10$~TeV.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.