Paper detail

New Physics Contribution to $B_s \to μ^+ μ^-$ within R-Parity Violating Supersymmetric Models

We re-visit the problem of New Physics (NP) contribution to the branching ratio of the $B_s \to μ^+ μ^-$ decay in light of the recent observation of this decay by LHCb. We consider R-parity violating (RPV) supersymmetric models as a primary example - recently one has reported stringent constraints on the products of the RPV coupling constants that account for the $B_s \to μ^+ μ^-$ transition at the tree level. We argue that despite the LHCb measurement of the $B(B_s \to μ^+ μ^-)$ is in a remarkable agreement with the Standard Model (SM) prediction, there is still room for a significant New Physics contribution to the $B(B_s \to μ^+ μ^-)$, as the sign of the $B_s \to μ^+ μ^-$ transition amplitude may be opposite to that of the Standard Model; alternatively the amplitude may have a large phase. We conduct our analysis mainly for the case of real RPV couplings. We find that taking into account the scenario with the sign flip of the $B_s \to μ^+ μ^-$ amplitude (as compared to that of the SM) makes the bounds on the RPV coupling products significantly weaker. Also, we discuss briefly how our results are modified if the RPV couplings have large phases. In particular, we examine the dependence of the derived bounds on the phase of the NP amplitude.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.