Paper detail

New Optimised Estimators for the Primordial Trispectrum

Cosmic microwave background studies of non-Gaussianity involving higher-order multispectra can distinguish between early universe theories that predict nearly identical power spectra. However, the recovery of higher-order multispectra is difficult from realistic data due to their complex response to inhomogeneous noise and partial sky coverage, which are often difficult to model analytically. A traditional alternative is to use one-point cumulants of various orders, which collapse the information present in a multispectrum to one number. The disadvantage of such a radical compression of the data is a loss of information as to the source of the statistical behaviour. A recent study by Munshi & Heavens (2009) has shown how to define the skew spectrum (the power spectra of a certain cubic field, related to the bispectrum) in an optimal way and how to estimate it from realistic data. The skew spectrum retains some of the information from the full configuration-dependence of the bispectrum, and can contain all the information on non-Gaussianity. In the present study, we extend the results of the skew spectrum to the case of two degenerate power-spectra related to the trispectrum. We also explore the relationship of these power-spectra and cumulant correlators previously used to study non-Gaussianity in projected galaxy surveys or weak lensing surveys. We construct nearly optimal estimators for quick tests and generalise them to estimators which can handle realistic data with all their complexity in a completely optimal manner. We show how these higher-order statistics and the related power spectra are related to the Taylor expansion coefficients of the potential in inflation models, and demonstrate how the trispectrum can constrain both the quadratic and cubic terms.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.