Paper detail

New methods to bound the critical probability in fractal percolation

Fractal percolation has been introduced by Mandelbrot in 1974. We study the two-dimensional case, with integer subdivision index M and survival probability p. It is well known that there exists a non-trivial critical value p_c(M) such that a.s. the largest connected component in the limiting set K is a point for p<p_c(M) and with positive probability there is a connected component intersecting opposite sides of the unit square for p\geq p_c(M). For all M\geq 2, the value of p_c(M) is unknown. In this paper we present ideas to find lower and upper bounds, significantly sharper than those already known. To find lower bounds, we compare fractal percolation with site percolation. A fundamentally new result is that for all M we construct an increasing sequence that converges to p_c(M). The terms in the sequence can in principle be calculated algorithmically. These ideas lead to (computer aided) proofs that p_c(2)> 0.881 and p_c(3)>0.784. For the upper bounds, we introduce the idea of classifications. The fractal percolation iteration process now induces an iterative random process on a finite alphabet, which is easier to analyze than the original process. This theoretical framework is the basis of computer aided proofs for the following upper bounds: p_c(2)<0.993, p_c(3)<0.940 and p_c(4)<0.972.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.