Paper detail

New low mass ratio contact binaries in the Catalina Sky Survey

We present the identification and photometric analysis of 30 new low mass ratio (LMR) totally eclipsing contact binaries found in Catalina Sky Survey data. The LMR candidates are identified using Fourier coefficients and visual inspection. We perform a detailed scan in the parameter plane of mass-ratio (q) versus inclination (i) using Phoebe-0.31 scripter to derive the best (q,i) pair for the initial models. The relative physical parameters are determined from the final model of each system. A Monte-Carlo approach was adopted to derive the parameter errors. The resulting parameters confirm the identification. The approximate absolute physical parameters of the systems are estimated based on the light curve solutions and Gaia early Data Release 3 distances. Twelve out of 30 new systems have fill-out factors $f\gt 50 \%$ and $q \leq 0.25$ (deep contact LMR systems), and 8 of them, to within errors, are extreme LMR deep systems with $q\leq0.1$. We discuss the evolutionary status of the 30 LMR systems in comparison with the most updated catalog of LMR systems from the literature. The scenario of the LMR systems as pre-merger candidates forming fast rotating stars is investigated for all systems, new and old, based both on Hut's stability criteria and critical instability mass ratio ($q_{inst}$) relation. CSS$\_$J075848.2+125656, with $\frac{q}{q_{inst}}=1.23\pm 0.23$, and CSS$\_$J093010.1-021624, with $\frac{q}{q_{inst}}=1.25\pm 0.23$, can be considered as merger candidates.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.