Paper detail

New look at the degeneracies in the neutrino oscillation parameters, and their resolution by T2K, NO$ν$A and ICAL

At present the three major unknowns in neutrino oscillation parameters are the mass hierarchy, the octant of $θ_{23}$ and the CP phase $δ_{CP}$. It is well known that the presence of hierarchy$-δ_{CP}$ and octant degeneracies affects the unambiguous determination of these parameters. In this paper we show that a comprehensive way to study the remaining parameter degeneracies is in the form of a generalized hierarchy-$θ_{23}$ - $δ_{CP}$ degeneracy. We show that the wrong-hierarchy and/or wrong-octant solutions can be further classified into eight different solutions depending on whether they occur with the wrong or right value of $δ_{CP}$. These eight solutions are different from the original eightfold degenerate solutions and can exist, in principle, even if $θ_{13}$ is known. These multiple solutions, apart from affecting the determination of the true hierarchy and octant, also affect the accurate estimation of $δ_{CP}$. We identify which of these eight different degenerate solutions can occur in the test ($θ_{23} - δ_{CP}$) parameter space, taking the long-baseline experiment NO$ν$A running in the neutrino mode as an example. The inclusion of the NO$ν$A antineutrino run removes the wrong-octant solutions appearing with both right and wrong hierarchy. Adding T2K data to this resolves the wrong hierarchy -- right octant solutions to a large extent. The remaining wrong hierarchy solutions can be removed by combining NO$ν$A + T2K with atmospheric neutrino data. We demonstrate this using ICAL@INO as the prototype atmospheric neutrino detector. We find that the degeneracies can be resolved at the $2σ$ level by the combined data set, for the true parameter space considered in the study.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.