Paper detail

New lattice sphere packings denser than Mordell-Weil lattices

1) We present new lattice sphere packings in Euclid spaces of many dimensions in the range 3332-4096, which are denser than known densest Mrodell-Weil lattice sphere packings in these dimensions. Moreover it is proved that if there were some nice linear binary codes we could construct lattices denser than Mordell-Weil lattices of many dimensions in the range 116-3332. 2) New lattices with densities at least 8 times of the densities of Craig lattices in the dimensions $p-1$, where $p$ is a prime satisfying $p-1 \geq 1222$, are constructed. Some of these lattices provide new record sphere packings. 3) Lattice sphere packings in many dimensions in the range 4098-8232 better than present records are presented. Some new dense lattice sphere packings in moderate dimensions $84, 85, 86, 181-189$ denser than any previously known sphere packings in these dimensions are also given. The construction is based on the analogues of Craig lattices.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.