Paper detail

New insights on the distant AGN population

Current X-ray surveys have proved to be essential tools in order to identify and study AGNs across cosmic time. However, there is evidence that the most heavily obscured AGNs are largely missing even in the deepest surveys. The search for these obscured AGNs is one of the most outstanding issues of extragalactic astronomy, since they are expected to make a major contribution to the high energy peak of the X-ray background (XRB) and might constitute a particularly active and dusty phase of black hole and galaxy evolution. Using a newly developed SED fitting technique to decompose the AGN from the star-formation emission in the infrared band we identify a sample of 17 IR bright quasars at z=1-3. For the majority of these sources the X-ray spectrum is well characterised by an absorbed power law model, revealing that ~25% of the sources are unabsorbed; the remainder of these IR quasars have moderate-to-high absorption (N_H>10^23 cm^-2), and ~25% are not detected in the X-rays and are likely to be Compton thick (N_H>10^24 cm^-2). We therefore find a much higher fraction of obscured than unobscured quasars, indicating that a large fraction of the luminous black hole accretion was very heavily obscured at z~2.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.