Paper detail

New Insights into the Criteria of Fast Radio Burst in the Light of FRB 20121102A

The total event number of fast radio bursts (FRBs) is accumulating rapidly with the improvement of existing radio telescopes and the completion of new facilities. Especially, the Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical radio Telescope (FAST) Collaboration has just reported more than one thousand bursts in a short observing period of 47 days \citep{LiD2021}. The interesting bimodal distribution in their work motivates us to revisit the definition of FRBs. In this work, we ascribe the bimodal distribution to two physical kinds of radio bursts, which may have different radiation mechanisms. We propose to use brightness temperature to separate two subtypes. For FRB 20121102A, the critical brightness temperature is $T_{\rm B,cri}\simeq10^{33}\,\rm K$. Bursts with $T_{\rm B}\geq T_{\rm B,cri}$ are denoted as "classical" FRBs, and further we find a tight pulse width-fluence relation ($T\propto\mathcal{F_ν}^{0.306}$) for them. On the contrary, the other bursts are considered as "atypical" bursts that may originate from a different physical process. We suggest that for each FRB event, a similar dividing line should exist but $T_{\rm B,cri}$ is not necessarily the same. Its exact value depends on FRB radiation mechanism and properties of the source.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.