Paper detail

New Insights for High-precision Asteroseismology: Acoustic Radius of KIC 6225718

Asteroseismology is a powerful tool for probing stellar interiors and determining stellar fundamental parameters. In previous works, $χ^2$-minimization method is usually used to find the best matching model to characterize observations. In this letter, we adopt the $χ^2$-minimization method but only using the observed high-precision oscillation to constrain theoretical models for solar-like oscillating star KIC 6225718, which is observed by \kepler\ satellite. We also take into account the influence of model precision. Finally, we find that the time resolution of stellar evolution can not be ignored in high-precision asteroseismic analysis. Based on this, we find the acoustic radius $τ_{0}$ is the only global parameter that can be accurately measured by $χ^2_ν$ matching method between observed frequencies and theoretical model calculations. We obtain $τ_{0}=4601.5^{+4.4}_{-8.3}$ seconds. In addition, we analyze the distribution of $χ^2_ν$-minimization models (CMMs), and find that the distribution range of CMMs is slightly enlarged by some extreme cases, which possess both of larger mass and higher (or lower) heavy element abundance, at lower acoustic radius end.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.