Paper detail

New identified (3H)4d - (3H)4f transitions of Fe II from UVES spectra of HR 6000 and 46 Aql

The analysis of the high-resolution UVES spectra of the CP stars HR 6000 and 46 Aql revealed the presence of an impressive number of unidentified lines, in particular in the 5000 - 5400 A region. Because numerous 4d-4f transitions of FeII lie in this spectral range, and because both stars are iron overabundant, we investigated whether the unidentified lines can be due to FeII. ATLAS12 model atmospheres with parameters [13450K, 4.3] and [12560K, 3.8] were computed for the individual abundances of HR 6000 and 46 Aql, respectively, in order to use the stars as spectroscopic sources to identify FeII lines and to determine FeII gf-values. After having identified several unknown lines in the stellar spectra as due to (3H)4d - (3H)4f transitions of FeII, we derived stellar log gf's for them by comparing observed and computed profiles. The energies of the upper levels were assigned on the basis of both laboratory iron spectra and predicted energy levels. We fixed 21 new levels of FeII with energies between 122910.9 cm^-1 and 123441.1 cm^-1. They allowed us to add 1700 new lines to the Fe II line list in the range 810 - 15011 A.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.