Paper detail

New evidences for the fluctuation characteristic of intradecadal periodic signals in length-of-day variation

The intradecadal fluctuations in the length-of-day variation (dLOD) are considered likely to play an important role in core motions. Two intradecadal oscillations, with 5.9yr and 8.5yr periods (referred to as SYO and EYO, respectively), have been detected in previous studies. However, whether the SYO and the EYO have stable damping trends since 1962 and whether geomagnetic jerks are possible excitation sources for the SYO/EYO are still debated. In this study, based on different methods and dLOD records with different time span, we show robust evidences to prove that the SYO and the EYO have no stable damping trends since 1962, and we find that there is also a possible 7.6yr signal. To prove whether it is a periodic signal, we use the optimal sequence estimation method to stack 35 global geomagnetic records, the results also show an 7.6yr periodic signal which has an Y2,-2 spatial distribution, and it has a high degree of consistent synchronicity with the 7.6yr signal in dLOD. After confirming that the jerks have no special consistency with the peaks/valleys of the EYO/SYO, we confirm that the geomagnetic jerks seem to be related to sudden changes in the SYO/EYO time series and their excitation series; so we finally suggest that jerks are possible excitation sources of the SYO/EYO. Meanwhile, after using a deconvolution method, we estimate that the period P and quality factor Q of the SYO and the EYO are [P=5.85+/-0.06yr, Q larger than 180] and [P=8.455+/-0.17yr, Q larger than 350], respectively.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.