Paper detail

New Evidence Supporting Cluster Membership for the Keystone Calibrator Delta Cephei

New and existing UBVJHKs, spectroscopic, NOMAD, HST, and revised HIP observations are employed to determine properties for delta Cep and its host star cluster. The multi-faceted approach ensured that uncertainties were mitigated (~2%). The following fundamental parameters were inferred for delta Cep: E(B-V)=0.073+-0.018, log(t)=7.9+-0.1, and d=272+-3(se)+-5(sd) pc. The cluster exhibits a turnoff near B6 (M*/Ms~5), and the brightest host cluster members are the supergiants zeta Cep (K1.5Ib) and delta Cep. To within the uncertainties, the two stars share common astrometric parameters (pi, mu_ra, mu_dec, RV\sim-17 km/s) and are tied to bluer members via the evolutionary track implied by the cluster's UBVJHKs color-color and color-magnitude diagrams. The cluster's existence is bolstered by the absence of an early-type sequence in color-magnitude diagrams for comparison fields. NOMAD data provided a means to identify potential cluster members (n~30) and double the existing sample. That number could increase with forthcoming precise proper motions (DASCH) for fainter main-sequence stars associated with classical Cepheids (e.g., delta Cep), which may invariably foster efforts to strengthen the Galactic Cepheid calibration and reduce uncertainties tied to H_0.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.