Paper detail

New Estimates of Time Delays in the Gravitationally Lensed System PG1115+080

We analyze all publicly available long-term optical observations of the gravitationally lensed quasar PG1115+080 for the purpose of estimating time delays between its four components. In particular, the light curves of PG1115+080 components obtained in 2001-2006 at Maidanak observatory (Uzbekistan) (Tsvetkova et al 2010} are considered. We find that the linear trend is observed in 2006 in light curves of all four components with fast variations only in the A1 and C components that can be due to microlensing and observational errors. Application of the MCCF method (Oknyansky 1993) to the photometric data obtained in 2004-2005 gives values of time delays $τ_{BC} = 22^{+2}_{-3}$, $τ_{AC} = 12^{+2}_{-1}$ and $τ_{BA} = 10^{+2}_{-3}$ days, which are in agreement with the results received earlier by Schechter and Barkana for 1995-1996 light curves with two different methods of statistic analysis. However, our estimates of $τ_{BA}$ and $τ_{BC}$ differ from the values received by the group of Vakulik based on the same Maidanak data (Vakulik et al 2009). The ratio $τ_{AC}/τ_{BA}$ is equal to $\sim 1.2$ that is close to the value, received by Barkana ($\sim 1.13$) and predicted by lens models ($\sim1.4$), unlike the values received by Schechter ($\sim 0.7$) and Vakulik ($\sim 2.7$).

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.