Paper detail

New estimates of the deceleration parameter in weak gravity

We consider weak gravity at accelerations $α<a_H$ when Rindler and cosmological horizon collude at $R_H=c/H$, where $c$ is the velocity of light and $H$ is the Hubble parameter. This is manifest in reduced inertia $m$, below the value $m_0$ in Newtonian gravity. Striking evidence for a sharp transition to weak gravity is found in galaxy rotation curves. Their sensitivity to the cosmological background is expressed by correlations to the deceleration parameter $q=1-(4πa_0/cH)^{2}$ and $q=-1/2 -3 (Ω_b/\sqrt{2}\sqrtπ)^{1/2}$, where $a_0$ is Milgrom's scale in the baryonic Tully-Fisher relation of spiral galaxies and $Ω_b$ is the baryonic matter density. The Planck value $Ω_b=0.048$ with $H\simeq 73$ km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$ shows $q\simeq-0.85$. Future surveys may determine $Q_0=\left.dq(z)/dz\right|_{z=0}$ to provide a direct test for dynamical dark energy ($Q_0>2.5$) versus $Λ$CDM ($Q_0<1$).

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.