Paper detail

New criteria for a ring to have a semisimple left quotient ring

Goldie's Theorem (1960), which is one of the most important results in Ring Theory, is a criterion for a ring to have a semisimple left quotient ring. The aim of the paper is to give four new criteria (using a completely different approach and new ideas). The first one is based on the recent fact that for an arbitrary ring $R$ the set $\CM$ of maximal left denominator sets of $R$ is a non-empty set: Theorem (The First Criterion). A ring $R$ has a semisimple left quotient ring $Q$ iff $\CM $ is a finite set, $\bigcap_{S\in \CM} \ass (S) =0$ and, for each $S\in \CM$, the ring $S^{-1}R$ is a simple left Artinian ring. In this case, $Q\simeq \prod_{S\in \CM} S^{-1}R$. The Second Criterion is given via the minimal primes of $R$ and goes further then the First one %and Goldie's Theorem in the sense that it describes explicitly the maximal left denominator sets $S$ via the minimal primes of $R$. The Third Criterion is close to Goldie's Criterion but it is easier to check in applications (basically, it reduces Goldie's Theorem to the prime case). The Fourth Criterion is given via certain left denominator sets.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.