Paper detail

New constraints on the X-ray spectral properties of type 1 AGN

We present a detailed characterization of the X-ray spectral properties of 761 type 1 AGN, selected from a cross-correlation of the SDSS DR5 quasar catalogue and the incremental version of the second XMM-Newton serendipitous X-ray source catalogue 2XMMi-DR2. The X-ray spectrum of each source is fit with models based on a simple power law to which additional cold absorption and/or soft excess features are added if an F-test at 99% significance requires them. The distribution of best-fitting photon indices, Gamma, is fit with a Gaussian with mean <gamma> = 1.99 +/- 0.01 and dispersion sigma = 0.30 +/- 0.01, however this does not provide a good representation of the distribution due to sources with very flat or steep gamma values. A highly significant trend for decreasing gamma values with increasing 2-10 keV luminosity, L_X, is seen but only a weak trend with redshift is found. Intrinsic cold absorption is detected in ~4% of the sample and soft excess emission is detected in ~8%. These values are lower limits due to the detectability being limited by the quality of the spectra and we suggest the intrinsic values may be as high as ~25% and ~80% respectively. The levels of rest-frame absorption are higher than expected for type 1 objects (N_H = 10^21-10^23 cm^-2) and the fraction of absorbed sources and the N_H values are not seen to vary with L_X or z. The average blackbody temperature used to model the soft excesses is <kT> = 0.17 +/- 0.09 keV. This temperature is found to correlate with L_X but not the blackbody luminosity or the black hole mass which do correlate with each other. A strong correlation is found between the luminosities in the blackbody and power law components suggesting that a similar fraction is re-processed from the blackbody to the power law component for the entire luminosity range of objects. . . [Abridged]

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.