Paper detail

New Constraints on the Origin of Surface Brightness Profile Breaks of Disk Galaxies from MaNGA

In an effort to probe the origin of surface brightness profile (SBP) breaks widely observed in nearby disk galaxies, we carry out a comparative study of stellar population profiles of 635 disk galaxies selected from the MaNGA spectroscopic survey. We classify our galaxies into single exponential (TI), down-bending (TII) and up-bending (TIII) SBP types, and derive their spin parameters and radial profiles of age/metallicity-sensitive spectral features. Most TII (TIII) galaxies have down-bending (up-bending) star formation rate (SFR) radial profiles, implying that abrupt radial changes of SFR intensities contribute to the formation of both TII and TIII breaks. Nevertheless, a comparison between our galaxies and simulations suggests that stellar migration plays a significant role in weakening down-bending $Σ_{\star}$ profile breaks. While there is a correlation between the break strengths of SBPs and age/metallicity-sensitive spectral features for TII galaxies, no such correlation is found for TIII galaxies, indicating that stellar migration may not play a major role in shaping TIII breaks, as is evidenced by a good correspondence between break strengths of $Σ_{\star}$ and surface brightness profiles of TIII galaxies. We do not find evidence for galaxy spin being a relevant parameter for forming different SBP types, nor do we find significant differences between the asymmetries of galaxies with different SBP types, suggesting that environmental disturbances or satellite accretion in the recent past do not significantly influence the break formation. By dividing our sample into early and late morphological types, we find that galaxies with different SBP types follow nearly the same tight stellar mass-$R_{25}$ relation, which makes the hypothesis that stellar migration alone can transform SBP types from TII to TI and then to TIII highly unlikely.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access9 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.