Paper detail

New constraints on the nuclear equation of state from the thermal emission of neutron stars in quiescent low-mass X-ray binaries

This paper presents a new analysis of the thermal emission from the neutron star surface to constrain the dense matter equation of state. It is based on the use of a Markov-Chain Monte Carlo algorithm combined with an empirical parametrization of the equation of state, as well as the consistent treatment of seven neutron star quiescent low-mass X-ray binaries in globular clusters with well-measured distances. Previous analyses have indicated that the thermal emission of these neutron stars tends to prefer low neutron star radii, questioning basic knowledge from nuclear physics. We show that it is possible to reconcile the thermal emission analyses with nuclear physics knowledge, with or without including a prior on the slope of the symmetry energy $L_{\rm sym}$. We obtain radii of the order of about 12~km without worsening the fit statistic. With an empirical parametrization of the equation of state, we obtain the following values for the slope of the symmetry energy, its curvature $K_{\rm sym}$, and the isoscalar skewness parameter $Q_{\rm sat}$: $L_{\rm sym}=37.2^{+9.2}_{-8.9}$ MeV, $K_{\rm sym}=-85^{+82}_{-70}$ MeV, and $Q_{\rm sat}=318^{+673}_{-366}$ MeV. For the first time, we measure the values of the empirical parameters $K_{\rm sym}$ and $Q_{\rm sat}$. These values are only weakly impacted by our assumptions, such as the distances or the number of free empirical parameters, provided they are taken within a reasonable range. We also study the weak sensitivity of our results to the set of sources analyzed, and we identify a group of sources that dominates the constraints. The resulting masses and radii obtained are also discussed in the context of the independent constraints from GW 170817 and its electromagnetic counterpart, AT 2017gfo.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.