Paper detail

New constraints on the dark matter density profiles of dwarf galaxies from proper motions of globular cluster streams

The central density profiles in dwarf galaxy halos depend strongly on the nature of dark matter. Recently, in Malhan et al. (2021), we employed N-body simulations to show that the cuspy cold dark matter (CDM) subhalos predicted by cosmological simulations can be differentiated from cored subhalos using the properties of accreted globular cluster (GC) streams since these GCs experience tidal stripping within their parent halos prior to accretion onto the Milky Way. We previously found that clusters that are accreted within cuspy subhalos produce streams with larger physical widths and higher dispersions in line-of-sight velocity and angular momentum than streams that are accreted within cored subhalos. Here, we use the same suite of simulations to demonstrate that the dispersion in the tangential velocities of streams ($σ_{v_\mathrm{Tan}}$) is also sensitive to the central DM density profiles of their parent dwarfs and GCs that were accreted from: cuspy subhalos produce streams with larger $σ_{v_\mathrm{Tan}}$ than those accreted inside cored subhalos. Using Gaia EDR3 observations of multiple GC streams we compare their $σ_{v_\mathrm{Tan}}$ values with simulations. The measured $σ_{v_\mathrm{Tan}}$ values are consistent with both an ``in situ'' origin and with accretion inside cored subhalos of $M\sim 10^{8-9}M_{\odot}$ (or very low-mass cuspy subhalos of mass $\sim 10^8M_{\odot}$). Despite the large current uncertainties in $σ_{v_\mathrm{Tan}}$, we find a low probability that any of the progenitor GCs were accreted from cuspy subhalos of $M_{\rm subhalo}\buildrel > \over \sim$ $10^9 M_{\odot}$. The uncertainties on Gaia tangential velocity measurements are expected to decrease in future and will allow for stronger constraints on subhalo DM density profiles.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.