Paper detail

New Competitive Analysis Results of Online List Scheduling Algorithm

Online algorithm has been an emerging area of interest for researchers in various domains of computer science. The online $m$-machine list scheduling problem introduced by Graham has gained theoretical as well as practical significance in the development of competitive analysis as a performance measure for online algorithms. In this paper, we study and explore the performance of Graham's online \textit{list scheduling algorithm(LSA)} for independent jobs. In the literature, \textit{LSA} has already been proved to be $2-\frac{1}{m}$ competitive, where $m$ is the number of machines. We present two new upper bound results on competitive analysis of \textit{LSA}. We obtain upper bounds on the competitive ratio of $2-\frac{2}{m}$ and $2-\frac{m^2-m+1}{m^2}$ respectively for practically significant two special classes of input job sequences. Our analytical results can motivate the practitioners to design improved competitive online algorithms for the $m$-machine list scheduling problem by characterization of real life input sequences.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.